No.
I want to make curve line.
↧
Re: create streamline
↧
Re: create streamline
ISO Curve is ..
↧
↧
Re: Autoballon autoorder in NX
Automatic order with ballons?
Could you please explain more with some example. It will be easy to help you.
↧
Re: curve projection
Try 'Wrap/Unwrap Curve' command.
↧
unlock part and assembly navigator in seperate windows... disable auto hide or shading
Hi, I am trying to find, if there is a way to have my part navigator and assembly navigator always ON with no auto-shading or transparency when I am using it in seperate windows. Is there a way to disable it ? thanks
↧
↧
Re: unlock part and assembly navigator in seperate windows... disable auto hide or shading
Try this:
To disable the dialog transparency select:
Menu --> Preferences --> User Interface ---> Layout --> Windows Style --> and
untoggle the Enable Transparency option.
↧
Re: unlock part and assembly navigator in seperate windows... disable auto hide or shading
thanks ! :-)
↧
Re: create streamline
Hi,
The isoparametric curve gives you straight line because the original patch is planar (the curved boundaries are the result of trimming the surface ).
In that case you need to use offset curve in face.
Best Regards
Kapil
↧
PROCESSOR FOR NX11
I wonder if is true that NX11 required an specific processor to run, i looked in the system specification and don`t mention anything about it, my company go to update to this version and possibly we must buy new
PC´s for that reason.
↧
↧
Re: PROCESSOR FOR NX11
While the NX11 System Requirement guidelines do discuss Processor Performance, SMP and Multi-Core, there is nothing that suggests that a specific processor is required. I'd be interested to know where you got that information.
Regards, Ben
↧
Re: PROCESSOR FOR NX11
I think the new requirement is SSSE3 instructions support. You need a intel Core 2 or a AMD bobcat any processor older than than won't run NX11 but this are quite old processor, it is not likely to still work with older machines.
↧
Re: Simulating: placing and taking out tricky coverplates ?
If you want to check the collision, use 'Move Component' command with Dynamic motion and Collision Detection options. If constraints are associated with the component, you need to suppress/remove them otherwise component will move with respect to the constraints.
Other way as Kapil mentioned, Use Extraction Path available in Assembly Sequence command. To know more about it refer to the video in the following link.
↧
Re: create streamline
I'm confused. The original picture shows a tool path, so as
↧
↧
Re: PROCESSOR FOR NX11
That information can be found in the Hardware Certification tables. The last tab on the spreadsheet "Caveats" explains that older x64 processors are not supported: "Older Intel and AMD processors that do not support SSSE3 instructions are not supported by NX11. NX tests the instruction set and raises an error on older processors. These instructions were introduced in 2006 and pervasive by 2008".
Regards, Ben
↧
Re: PROCESSOR FOR NX11
I tried to install NX11 on my personal laptop. I've run 9 and 10 on it no problem. Sometimes I've had to take my job into the woods...
NX11 installs but wont run. Says unsupported processor
It's an AMD Phenon II 850
↧
Need help tying to borrow a NX License
So I'm trying to figure out how to borrow a licence. I'm going into the Siemens PLM Software Licensing Tool....I click on what I want to borrow. Then when I go on my laptop I do not see anything in the Licensing Tool that I can borrow...what am I doing wrong here? How do I go from selecting what I want to borrow, to getting on my laptop and actually borrowing the license and havign it work?
↧
Best practice for assigning parameters to dimensions?
When assigning a parameter to a dimension, I have two options:
A. Rename the dimension. For example, if I have dimension p1, change its name to, say, "rod_length" and maybe edit its value (50mm).
B. Define a new expression named "rod_length" with a length value of 50mm, then assign it to dimension p1.
Is one approach consider better than the other? Approach A seems easier, but B may be a little cleaner and can be done ahead of time. I'm working on a model in which I'll need to define several dozen parameters and wondering which way to go. Thanks!
↧
↧
Re: Need help tying to borrow a NX License
It seems like you are describing borrowing a license on one computer then wishing it was actually borrowed an other. Is that what you are saying? You need to borrow from the computer that you want to use.
↧
Re: Best practice for assigning parameters to dimensions?
Hi,
In most cases it does not make much difference. But there is one case you might want to consider. If you rename the expression and you delete the feature (and it is not referenced elsewhere) then your expression is deleted as well. When you create an expression first and reference it, then the dimension is retained.
When you type "A=10" into the extrude limit then NX will create an expression A=0 and have the extrude reference it as p456=A. so you can do this on the fly.
Last tip: Use capitals for user expressions, it makes them easier to find/sort when looking at the complete list.
Regards, **bleep**
↧
Re: Referenced edge does not exist
Hi,
I would have used pattern face. This is much faster then patterning features that you are the same anyway.
First always try pattern face. Then pattern geometry and pattern feature last. Pattern feature is only useful when the instance need to be variable (like resizing following other inputs).
We used to only have pattern feature, but it should be the one that is least used.
Regards, **bleep**
↧